Marshall’s Arrival Killed the EFF’s Rhythm and Momentum

Azania, a vocal supporter of the MK Party, has dropped a bombshell by claiming that Marshall Dlamini’s rise within the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) has disrupted the party’s rhythm and momentum. This bold statement, which is already stirring controversy, suggests that the influx of power by Dlamini, who was recently appointed as the party’s Secretary-General, has been a catalyst for the high-profile resignations of leaders like Floyd Shivambu, Fana Mokoena, and Mbuyiseni Ndlozi.

“The arrival of Marshall killed the EFF’s rhythm and momentum,” Azania remarked. “He’s responsible for the departure of key leaders like Floyd, Fana, and Ndlozi. Their faction is now strong and untouchable because it has proximity to Julius Malema.”

Dlamini’s ascent to a prominent position within the EFF has raised eyebrows. He is widely seen as a staunch ally of Julius Malema, which has led to concerns about the consolidation of power within the party. Critics have argued that Dlamini’s leadership style has marginalized dissenting voices, further fueling the growing factionalism that has plagued the EFF. His presence, they contend, has created divisions among the party’s leadership, leading to the departure of some of its most influential figures.

The recent resignations of Shivambu, Mokoena, and Ndlozi have sent shockwaves through the EFF, with each departure pointing to disagreements over leadership and the party’s direction. Shivambu, a founding member, stepped down in 2024, citing a fallout with Malema and disillusionment with the party’s current trajectory. Similarly, Mokoena and Ndlozi followed suit, leaving in protest over what they perceived as a shift away from the party’s original revolutionary ideals.

Azania’s comments echo the frustrations of former EFF supporters who feel the party has drifted away from its core values. “The party’s internal dynamics are no longer about revolutionary ideals but about consolidating power within a select group,” one former supporter observed. This sentiment is not isolated, with others criticizing the party for focusing more on internal power struggles than on achieving its initial political goals.

The EFF leadership has remained tight-lipped regarding Azania’s allegations, but the growing number of high-profile resignations continues to raise doubts about the party’s unity. As the 2024 general elections approach, questions are mounting about whether the EFF can regroup and regain its momentum, or if the internal rifts will prove insurmountable.

Supporters of Dlamini, on the other hand, argue that his leadership is exactly what the party needs. They believe that his rise within the party could strengthen its base and help push forward its goals with renewed focus. By aligning with Malema, Dlamini’s faction is seen by some as the key to ensuring the party remains a dominant force in the political landscape, despite the departures.

Meanwhile, the MK Party, which has been gaining momentum, continues to attract former EFF members, including notable figures such as Advocate Dali Mpofu. As more disillusioned EFF supporters flock to the MK camp, the spotlight is firmly on the EFF’s internal struggles and its ability to regain the confidence of its base.

The political landscape is shifting rapidly, and the next few months will be critical for the EFF as it seeks to navigate its internal conflicts. The party’s ability to overcome the factionalism and unite its leadership will determine whether it can remain a significant player in South Africa’s upcoming elections, or whether the momentum has already shifted beyond its reach.

As the tension continues to rise, one question remains: will Marshall Dlamini’s influence prove to be the turning point the EFF needs, or has his rise irrevocably altered the party’s course? Only time will tell.